By: Bill W. Childs
I had the honor of meeting with David Blumenthal at HIMSS last week along with selected CIO’s, physicians, and vendor representatives. Our discussions centered on the costs and benefits of the ARRA and Meaningful Use criteria.
My Concerns:
- Time lines for ARRA, Meaningful Use, HIPAA 5010, and ICD-10 are too tight. Some providers (with anywhere from one to ten facilities)who have been working on these efforts for years, can easily reach meaningful use criteria. However, there are many large and small providers who will not be able to meet the time lines as established. “Too many guidelines; too little time”.
- The cost of these efforts is beyond the ability for 80% of providers. It will take a great deal to implement and prove the needed requirements to reach meaningful use and history shows that it will cost much more than most people expect.
- There is not enough industry experienced talent to get these projects implemented. As an industry observer for more than 30 years, I can already see providers hiring bodies that are not talented enough to get the job done. Implementing these systems is a very difficult task, and many of the most talented are already on the assignment.
My Peers' Concerns (in addition to those listed above):
- The board and “C” suite lack of understanding the full impact of the effort (time, cost, talent, change, security, and interactions with entities not under their control).
- The cost of sustaining these Herculean efforts.
- The cost and effort to report to all of the new agencies and on all of the new data requirements.
My session with Blumenthal was enlightening. Not only were some of my concerns confirmed, but I was also made aware of other aspects to be apprehensive about. Here is one silver lining though: The effort and direction is a good thing. HIT, if built properly, implemented properly, and maintained the right way with updates as necessary, is the only technology introduced to healthcare delivery systems that has the potential to reduce costs and eliminate errors, thus improving quality.
What are your major concerns? What efforts and ideas would you like to applaud?